Peer Review Process

The Jambo Digitech journal employs a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of the published manuscripts. The process is as follows:

  1. Initial Submission Check

    • All submitted manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial team to ensure compliance with the journal's focus, scope, and formatting guidelines.
    • Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements are returned to the authors for revision or rejected without further review.

  2. Double-Blind Peer Review

    • Manuscripts passing the initial check are assigned to at least two reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
    • The double-blind review process ensures anonymity between authors and reviewers to maintain impartiality.

  3. Reviewer Evaluation

    • Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:
      • Originality and contribution to the field.
      • Methodological rigor and technical soundness.
      • Clarity of presentation and logical coherence.
      • Relevance to the journal’s focus and scope.
    • Reviewers provide recommendations, which may include:
      • Acceptance with no revisions.
      • Minor revisions.
      • Major revisions.
      • Rejection.

  4. Editorial Decision

    • The editorial team reviews the recommendations and comments provided by the reviewers.
    • Based on the reviewers' feedback, the editor-in-chief makes the final decision, which is communicated to the authors.

  5. Revision Process

    • If revisions are required, authors are given a specific timeframe to address the reviewers' comments and resubmit the manuscript.
    • Revised manuscripts may undergo additional rounds of review if necessary.

  6. Final Approval and Publication

    • Once the manuscript meets all standards, it is approved for publication.
    • The editorial team performs final checks, including formatting and proofreading, before publication.

The entire peer-review process is designed to ensure transparency, objectivity, and the highest academic standards in every published article.